{"id":36547,"date":"2024-01-25T18:05:15","date_gmt":"2024-01-25T18:05:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/?p=36547"},"modified":"2025-01-14T20:37:20","modified_gmt":"2025-01-14T20:37:20","slug":"celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/","title":{"rendered":"Celebs: They\u2019re Just Like Us! (Or Might Be, Under These New Anti-Deepfake Bills)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

One concern that\u2019s resurfaced in artificial intelligence policy discourse is the risk of AI as an impersonation tool. This has been of particular concern for celebrities<\/a>, but there\u2019s plenty to worry about for non-celebrities, too. Despite this kind of tool grabbing headlines for imitating creative artists, the underlying problem isn\u2019t about infringing copyright (because you don\u2019t have a copyright in your own likeness) \u2013 it\u2019s actually about an AI potentially using someone\u2019s name, image, or likeness to impersonate<\/em> that person and cause them reputational or financial harm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Some) states have \u201cright of publicity\u201d laws<\/a> that allow (some) individuals to control (some) uses of their likeness. But these laws aren\u2019t hugely helpful to most people, because they (a) are only available to folks in certain states; (b) don\u2019t protect against non-commercial uses or impersonations; and (c) are designed to protect celebrities and public figures, whose likenesses are already commercially valuable. If you\u2019re not a public figure, or you live in a state without some kind of publicity rights framework, you have no recourse. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Congress is trying to change this. Congresswoman Maria Salazar recently introduced the No AI FRAUD Act<\/a>; late last year, Senator Chris Coons released discussion text of his proposed NO FAKES Act<\/a>. Both try to expand the right-of-publicity framework to cover private citizens, and the results are mixed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The traditional right of publicity framework is an economic<\/em> right. If you can make money off licensing your likeness (including your voice), and someone uses your likeness without paying you, then doing so deprives you of money, and the unauthorized user must compensate you. (As a practical matter, this is usually structured as a property right \u2013 a snarl discussed more below.) Protecting against these kinds of unauthorized uses is a top priority not only for celebrities and other well-known individuals, but also for people such as actors and singers whose livelihood depends on their unique look or sound.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But most people outside of these fields aren\u2019t worried about AI being used to funnel away revenue. A more realistic threat profile for many people includes their image being used to nonconsensually generate pornography, deceive employers or the public, or otherwise threaten or humiliate them. The risk is particularly high for women and people of color, as well as other marginalized identities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Using an economic framework to try and also protect against these non-economic harms is a stretch. Both bills go about this by designing themselves as new kinds of property rights, akin to copyrights and trademarks, to allow control over the use of their images. The main reason behind this is because (a) traditional right-of-publicity laws are considered intellectual property, so it\u2019s a familiar framework; (b) proponents want to preserve the ability of people in the \u201cprofessional\u201d category discussed above to be able to license out their likenesses to studios, record labels, and other third parties; and (c) these proponents also want to be able to license (or prevent unauthorized use) even after that actor or singer has died. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is a dangerous starting place. Intellectual property rights come with a massive amount of common law and statutory baggage. Because IP is fundamentally a speech-regulating regime (if you don\u2019t believe me, you can take the Supreme Court\u2019s word for it<\/a>), it requires massive contortions and carve-outs to comply with the First Amendment. Both bills try to side-step this by some combination of listing explicit cases in which an unauthorized AI replica is defensible (such as using a person\u2019s likeness in a biopic where they are the subject, or criticism and commentary on current events), along with general but self-obvious statements like, \u201cThe First Amendment is a defense.\u201d While I can\u2019t blame anyone for wanting to avoid the inevitably tangled jurisprudence that comes with accommodating the First Amendment, it\u2019s a fool\u2019s errand; neither bill\u2019s list of exceptions encompasses the full realm of protected speech, and the No AI FRAUD Act even attempts to lay out a ham-handed test that mostly asks variations of, \u201cHow much money is at stake?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, IP licenses are, by default, open-ended in duration and all-purpose in scope; in other words, the likelihood is that this would just create a new line in every record label contract, requiring the recording artist to sign over their likeness to the label for any commercial use, for the full duration of this \u201cproperty right.\u201d There needs to be a mechanism to ensure that this doesn\u2019t happen, and that individuals automatically regain the rights to their likeness after a reasonable amount of time. \u201cTermination\u201d schemes, where the onus is on the individuals to jump through administrative hoops to secure their rights, end up being a scrambled mess that\u2019s easily abused by the major licensees. An automatic reversion \u2013 after, say, 10 years \u2013 or a \u201cuse it or lose it\u201d provision requiring the reversion after three years of non-use would ensure that professionals retain the benefit of their image rights. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

And the length of the term itself is another sticking point. There should be some<\/em> term of protection after death; the idea of CGI duplicates popping up before a celebrity\u2019s body is even cold is grotesque. But the NO FAKES Act pegs the term of protection to 70 years after the life of the person in question. The overwhelming majority of people won\u2019t need anything approaching that. (No AI FRAUD is set at a more reasonable 10 years after death, along with some confusing language that may indicate a longer, or possibly shorter, term, depending on how you read it.)  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Using a property law framing is, frankly, a bad idea. Congress is designing a new law from the ground up \u2013 and, in many ways, they\u2019re trying to shirk some of the baggage (such as fair use) of existing IP law. If they want a clean slate, there are plenty of alternatives to consider: Congress could focus on the harms they are trying to prevent directly by using a tort-style regime; they could frame it as a privacy right. There is nothing in the goals of these bills that requires <\/em>them to use a property rights or IP framework as a starting point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Liability for platforms and services is also a mess. No AI FRAUD explicitly targets what it calls \u201cAI cloning technology,\u201d and makes it an offense merely to offer<\/em> this technology in interstate commerce. This is unworkable for a whole number of reasons (not least of which is that it would ban things like Apple\u2019s accessibility-focused voice cloning tool,<\/a> and most existing movie CGI technology). Both bills imply, without clarification, that any website onto which a user uploads an unauthorized digital replica might also <\/em>be liable for that replica. Characterizing a new right as “intellectual property” also means that Section 230 of the Communications Act<\/a> would not apply to services (for example, social media platforms) hosting material that infringes that right. But there would be no way for a platform to know whether material does or does not infringe, and this would make services less likely to host user-submitted material at all, and could lead to over-broad moderation policies. (This applies to 230 and copyright as well, but copyright has a separate liability shield for platforms: the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The most obvious (and workable) answer for liability \u2013 and as a copyright lawyer, I say this begrudgingly \u2013 seems to be a notice-and-takedown system \u00e0 la the DMCA. But we have already seen the scope of abuse that \u201cregular\u201d DMCA notice-and-takedown prompts; what can we expect from a system that requires removal of a work whenever someone in it claims that they\u2019re being impersonated? Embarrassing videos of public figures, videos or audio of police misconduct, and news footage could all be memory-holed with a single bad-faith claim \u2013 especially since public figures are already getting in the habit of blaming anything they don\u2019t like as \u201cAI generated.\u201d<\/a> This is a place where lawmakers need to learn the lessons of the DMCA, and include strong, automatic civil penalties for abusive or inappropriate takedowns. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

To be clear: There\u2019s some unalloyed good in these bills. The No AI FRAUD Act explicitly lists unauthorized use in child sexual abuse material, sexually explicit imagery, and \u201cintimate images\u201d as per se harms subject to significant damages. But there\u2019s still a lot of work to be done, from moving away from an IP framework to thinking through issues of abuse. The people deserve something \u2013 and these bills, as they stand, aren\u2019t it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

One concern that\u2019s resurfaced in artificial intelligence policy discourse is the risk of AI as an impersonation tool. This has been of particular concern for celebrities, but there\u2019s plenty to worry about for non-celebrities, too.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":117,"featured_media":36548,"parent":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[12,29],"class_list":["post-36547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insights","tag-copyright-reform","tag-trustworthy-ai"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nCelebs: They\u2019re Just Like Us! (Or Might Be, Under These New Anti-Deepfake Bills) - Public Knowledge<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A recurring theme in policy discourse is the risk of AI as an impersonation tool for celebrities and civilians alike\u2014and new bills promise to address this.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Celebs: They\u2019re Just Like Us! (Or Might Be, Under These New Anti-Deepfake Bills)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A recurring theme in policy discourse is the risk of AI as an impersonation tool for celebrities and civilians alike\u2014and new bills promise to address this.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Public Knowledge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-25T18:05:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-14T20:37:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/algorithmic-harms-1440x720.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1440\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"720\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Meredith Filak Rose\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Meredith Filak Rose\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Meredith Filak Rose\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#\/schema\/person\/cb2c92f558c63e83a5ef351b4a5855b0\"},\"headline\":\"Celebs: They\u2019re Just Like Us! (Or Might Be, Under These New Anti-Deepfake Bills)\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-25T18:05:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-14T20:37:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/\"},\"wordCount\":1442,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/algorithmic-harms.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Copyright Reform\",\"Trustworthy AI\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Insights\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/\",\"name\":\"Celebs: They\u2019re Just Like Us! (Or Might Be, Under These New Anti-Deepfake Bills) - Public Knowledge\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/algorithmic-harms.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-25T18:05:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-14T20:37:20+00:00\",\"description\":\"A recurring theme in policy discourse is the risk of AI as an impersonation tool for celebrities and civilians alike\u2014and new bills promise to address this.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/algorithmic-harms.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/algorithmic-harms.png\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":1000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Celebs: They\u2019re Just Like Us! (Or Might Be, Under These New Anti-Deepfake Bills)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/\",\"name\":\"Public Knowledge\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Public Knowledge\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/pk_social_logo-2.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/pk_social_logo-2.png\",\"width\":400,\"height\":200,\"caption\":\"Public Knowledge\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#\/schema\/person\/cb2c92f558c63e83a5ef351b4a5855b0\",\"name\":\"Meredith Filak Rose\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cfd511c13833cba381073f177bfeda54b7d01b94eb6fdcbfffdd840260654185?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cfd511c13833cba381073f177bfeda54b7d01b94eb6fdcbfffdd840260654185?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Meredith Filak Rose\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/author\/meredith-filak-rose\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Celebs: They\u2019re Just Like Us! (Or Might Be, Under These New Anti-Deepfake Bills) - Public Knowledge","description":"A recurring theme in policy discourse is the risk of AI as an impersonation tool for celebrities and civilians alike\u2014and new bills promise to address this.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Celebs: They\u2019re Just Like Us! (Or Might Be, Under These New Anti-Deepfake Bills)","og_description":"A recurring theme in policy discourse is the risk of AI as an impersonation tool for celebrities and civilians alike\u2014and new bills promise to address this.","og_url":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/","og_site_name":"Public Knowledge","article_published_time":"2024-01-25T18:05:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-14T20:37:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1440,"height":720,"url":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/algorithmic-harms-1440x720.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Meredith Filak Rose","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Meredith Filak Rose","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/"},"author":{"name":"Meredith Filak Rose","@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#\/schema\/person\/cb2c92f558c63e83a5ef351b4a5855b0"},"headline":"Celebs: They\u2019re Just Like Us! (Or Might Be, Under These New Anti-Deepfake Bills)","datePublished":"2024-01-25T18:05:15+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-14T20:37:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/"},"wordCount":1442,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/algorithmic-harms.png","keywords":["Copyright Reform","Trustworthy AI"],"articleSection":["Insights"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/","url":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/","name":"Celebs: They\u2019re Just Like Us! (Or Might Be, Under These New Anti-Deepfake Bills) - Public Knowledge","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/algorithmic-harms.png","datePublished":"2024-01-25T18:05:15+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-14T20:37:20+00:00","description":"A recurring theme in policy discourse is the risk of AI as an impersonation tool for celebrities and civilians alike\u2014and new bills promise to address this.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/algorithmic-harms.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/algorithmic-harms.png","width":2000,"height":1000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/celebs-theyre-just-like-us-or-might-be-under-these-new-anti-deepfake-bills\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Celebs: They\u2019re Just Like Us! (Or Might Be, Under These New Anti-Deepfake Bills)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/","name":"Public Knowledge","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#organization","name":"Public Knowledge","url":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/pk_social_logo-2.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/pk_social_logo-2.png","width":400,"height":200,"caption":"Public Knowledge"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#\/schema\/person\/cb2c92f558c63e83a5ef351b4a5855b0","name":"Meredith Filak Rose","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cfd511c13833cba381073f177bfeda54b7d01b94eb6fdcbfffdd840260654185?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cfd511c13833cba381073f177bfeda54b7d01b94eb6fdcbfffdd840260654185?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Meredith Filak Rose"},"url":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/author\/meredith-filak-rose\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/117"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36547"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36547\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36548"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publicknowledge.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}